_. woe mene AU bP SA
—— EER TO ANS _ a
ym cea hd THA AL lL
701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 4001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
BGA
Docket No: 80
a
15 Jamuery 2
-14
4 ~J
In bk
This is in reference to your latest reconsideration request
dated 2 July 2014. You previously petitioned the Board on
several occasions and were advised in our letters that your
applications had been denied.
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three-
member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session on 14 January 2015. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application and any material submitted in support of
your application.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board determined that the medical evidence that you
provided, even though not previously considered by the Board,
was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. The Board determined that the post service
psychological evaluation you provided was not enough to outweigh
the significant misconduct you committed while serving on active
guty. Accordingly, your application has been denied.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. you are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board within one year from the date of the Board’s decision.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that 4
presumption of regularity attaches to ail official records.
a correction of an officiat
Consequently, when applying for
jicant to demonstrate che
naval record, the burden is on the app
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
WM ful
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4400 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Docket MNo.NkKO44U0-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an ofiiciai naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR13250 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an’official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4896 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4449 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board ' prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5450 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Docket No.NRO5450-14 on of an official Consequently, when applying for a correcti to demonstrate the naval record, the burden is on the applicant existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10921 14
your latest reconsideration request Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 28 January 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that your assertion of post- traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), even though not previously considered by the Board, was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5030 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 December 2014. evidence not previously considered by the Board its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official ‘naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4625 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in Docket NOo.NKU4S62b~-14 this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3828 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Docket No.NRO3828-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4396 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.